Popular Articles

Global Health Programmes Improve Specific Health Outcomes But Can Constrain Health Systems Of Poor Countries
The emergence of global health initiatives (GHIs), eg, The Global Fund and PEPFAR, has resulted in a striking expansion of key health interventions in recent years, from which millions have benefited. There is also evidence, however, that such initiatives can constrain the health systems of poor countries and that many opportunities to improve efficiency, equity, value for money and outcomes in global public health are still being missed. The health systems strengthening agenda needs more investment, and to be infused with the same sense of ambition and speed that has characterised GHIs. This is one of five key recommendations in a new multi-partner report published in a Health Policy paper in this week"s edition of The Lancet.

Epeius Biotechnologies' Rexin-G Receives FDA Fast Track Designation For The Treatment Of Pancreatic Cancer
Epeius Biotechnologies announced that its lead product, Rexin-G, has been granted Fast Track designation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use as a second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. The FDA Fast Track program, like Priority Review and Accelerated Approval, was implemented to facilitate the development and expedite the review of potentially important new drugs. The Fast Track Product designation, in particular, is granted following a critical evaluation of the "seriousness" or life-threatening nature of the unmet medical need, namely pancreatic cancer, and the potential of Rexin-G and its progressive clinical development to address this unmet need.
News of the day
British Medical Association Voices Concerns About Plans For London Hospitals
Plans to replace London"s District General Hospitals with new local hospitals providing fewer services carry clinical risks and need more thought, the BMA says today.
Mental Health

House Democrats Push Their Health Reform Plan

House Democrats" health care bill draft released Friday is likely to survive relatively intact, "including a robust new Medicare-like public health plan that would compete with private companies in a national health insurance exchange," Roll Call reports. House committees will begin hearings this week on the bill, which also includes national health insurance exchanges and would give subsidies to people living up to 400 percent of the federal poverty level - $88,000 this year for a family of four. Medicaid would be expanded to families up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level. "The plan would be paid for by a new 8 percent payroll tax on employers that do not provide health insurance to their employees, a new 2 percent tax on individuals who do not buy health insurance, other taxes still to be determined, and cuts within the Medicare and Medicaid programs." Congressional Budget Office numbers have not been released on the bill, "(b)ut Democrats said their plan would ultimately result in lower costs by reforming a system that they argue is full of waste. "There is no question that we will be saving trillions of dollars in the industry," Ways and Means Chairman Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y., said. "Is this going to bring down the cost of health insurance? You bet your sweet life."" "Republicans, who released a four-page outline of their health care alternative Wednesday, ripped the plan minutes after it was released. "This plan is nothing less than a government takeover of health care, and families and small businesses who are already footing the bill for Washington"s reckless spending binge will not support it," House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, said" (Dennis, 6/22). New York Times: "Under the House bill, health insurance would be regulated by a powerful new federal agency, headed by a presidential appointee known as the health choices commissioner." "Under the bill, the public plan would be run by the Department of Health and Human Services and would offer three or four policies, with different levels of benefits. The plan would initially use Medicare fee schedules, paying most doctors and hospitals at Medicare rates, plus about 5 percent. After three years, the health secretary could negotiate with doctors and hospitals" (Pear and Herszenhorn, 6/19). CQPolitics: "Under one provision in the 852-page draft legislation, health insurance companies would have their profit and administrative margins limited to 15 percent of the money they take in through premiums. Known as a "minimum loss ratio," the requirement would take effect within a year of the bill"s enactment into law and would apply to all private insurers. Health insurance customers would get any extra money rebated back to them, according to the bill" (Armstrong, 6/19). There are some misgivings on the bill, however, in the Democratic Party, CongressDaily reports: "Rep. Jim Cooper (Democrat) of Tennessee has emerged as the leading critic of leadership for not working with Republicans. Ramming partisan legislation through using the fast-track reconciliation process is not a sustainable option, Cooper argued, and he said he will push for a bill some Republicans can support" (Edney, 6/19). The Washington Times: "Industry and advocacy groups were split. The insurance industry said it is concerned about the public plan, while AARP praised it as a good first step" (Haberkorn, 6/20). This information was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with kind permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives and sign up for email delivery at kaiserhealthnews.org. © Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.


Add your comment:
Name:
Site address: http://
Your message:
Enter today\\\\'s date, 2 digits
(spam protection):